IronSocket review vs. Surfshark review
I’ll start with a comparison of the most important aspect of any VPN - privacy. During review I will consider whether VPN logs anything (IP address, traffic, DNS logs, bandwidth, or any type of timestamps) and the jurisdiction of VPN’s country of origin.
IronSocket is located in Hong Kong which is not part of 5 9 14 eyes countries and is not part of enemies of the internet countries while Surfshark is located in British Virgin Island which is not part of 5 9 14 eyes countries and is not part of enemies of the internet countries.
It’s important to note that If you are like me and you will be using VPN only to unblock GEO-restricted content, privacy will not be that important factor but it’s still essential for any VPN.
The next category I want to compare are features of IronSocket and Surfshark such as kill-switch, unblocking of streaming, support of P2P traffic (torrenting). I am a heavy user of various streaming platforms so for me it’s important whether VPN unblocks major streaming services such as Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime, HBO or BBC. I don’t do much torrenting but it’s always good to use a VPN while doing so. If this is an important factor for you, definitely look for a VPN which supports P2P traffic.
|P2P traffic - torrents||Yes||Yes|
As you can see from the comparison table above, IronSocket doesn't have kill-switch, supports streaming services, and supports torrenting. On the flipside Surfshark has kill-switch, supports streaming services, and supports torrenting.
Being hidden behind VPN shouldn’t limit the speed of your connection. I’ve measured the speed of each VPN against a 100mbps connection - which should be sufficient for any activities including heavy streaming in 4K or downloading large files.
In my test IronSocket was more on the fast side while Surfshark had average speed. If there were no limits in speed on a 100mbps connection, I consider VPN a “fast” one. If the speed is limited somehow but still achieving decent values, I categorize it as “average”. The “slow” is usually used for VPNs which limit your bandwidth significantly.
I will start by comparing the type of encryption IronSocket and Surfshark use, what tunnelling protocols are available, and finally we’ll test whether it leaks the IP address or DNS.
|Tunneling protocols||OpenVPN, PPTP and L2TP||OpenVPN and IKEv2|
The most important factor of a VPN service is a strong encryption of the traffic which is forwarded through the VPN servers. The most common encryption types in cryptography are SHA encryption or AES encryption which are not really comparable against each other. There might be different lengths of encryptions (eg. 128-bit, 256-bit, 2048-bit) and while usually the higher is the better, for most use cases you will be fine with any encryption. Watch-out if there is no encryption at all. IronSocket uses 256-bit and OpenVPN, PPTP and L2TP protocol and Surfshark uses 256-bit and es 256-bit and OpenVPN and IKEv2 protocols. I’ve tested both VPNs also for IP and DNS leaks and IronSocket had no IP leaks and No DNS leaks while Surfshark had No IP leaks and No DNS leaks.
Probably one of the most important decision factor for the majority of users will be price. Shocking? Not really. We all love to compare things and I am not different. It’s always good to get the best value for your hard-earned money, isn’t it? So let’s see whether IronSocket or Surfshark is cheaper.
IronSocket supports 3 connections at the same time while it works fine on all the platforms below. You can use Surfshark on unlimited devices at the same time with support of all these platforms:
Should you have any problems with IronSocket or Surfshark you can reach out to their support via:
IronSocket ranked in our list on 69. position while Surfshark. is on 2 position. If you are looking for a better choice, see our rankings here.